Logo

Bears vs Packers: Wild Card Showdown Will Be Impacted by a Snowstorm — What Bears Fans Need to Know

Chicago, Illinois – January 8, 2026

Chicago Bears fans counting down to Saturday night’s Wild Card clash with the Green Bay Packers may want to keep one eye on the weather report. According to updated forecasts, there is up to a 70% chance of snow or wintry mix at Soldier Field, raising the possibility that kickoff time could be adjusted if conditions worsen.

As of now, the matchup between the Chicago Bears and Green Bay Packers remains scheduled for 7:00 PM CT on Saturday, January 10, 2026, with Chicago entering the postseason as the No. 2 seed in the NFC. The Bears earned the right to host by grinding through a physical regular season, and Soldier Field was always expected to play a role. Winter may simply amplify that advantage.

Article image

Meteorologists project temperatures hovering between 32–35°F (0–2°C), but the real factor is wind. Sustained winds of 14–20 mph, with gusts approaching 45–48 mph, could significantly affect the passing game, kicking accuracy, and field position. Snow accumulation is expected to be light, but swirling gusts could make conditions unpredictable, especially after sunset.

For Bears fans, that scenario feels familiar—and often favorable. Chicago has long embraced cold-weather football, and a messy, physical game would align with the identity this team has built. Coaches and players have consistently emphasized discipline, ball security, and situational football—traits that matter most when weather turns a playoff game into a grind.

Article image

On the field, the Bears are expected to be close to full strength heading into the weekend. Rookie quarterback Caleb Williams has practiced without limitation and appears comfortable handling late-season conditions. The Bears’ offensive plan is expected to lean on balance and field control, especially if winds limit downfield passing. Defensively, Chicago’s emphasis on pressure and tackling becomes even more critical if footing deteriorates.

From a viewing standpoint, the game will air nationally on Amazon Prime Video, with local simulcasts available in the Chicago market. Fans attending the game are encouraged to prepare for cold and wind, and to monitor league updates in case kickoff timing is adjusted.

Betting markets have reflected the forecast, with the total drifting downward as weather concerns grow—an indication that oddsmakers expect a lower-scoring, possession-driven contest. For Bears supporters, that only adds to the intrigue.

While no major winter storm warnings are currently in effect, the NFL will continue monitoring conditions through Saturday. Any changes to kickoff would be announced promptly.

For Bears fans, the message is simple: winter football is part of Chicago’s DNA. Snow, wind, and cold won’t diminish the moment—they may define it. And if Soldier Field turns hostile, it could be exactly the environment this team needs to take the next step in its playoff journey.

75 views
Philip Rivers Pushes Back at CBS Legend Jim Nantz Just Hours After Allegedly Disrespectful Remarks About Shane Steichen During Colts–Texans Game
Just hours after the matchup between the Indianapolis Colts and the Houston Texans, the NFL community was stirred when Colts legend Philip Rivers publicly expressed his displeasure with controversial remarks made by longtime CBS broadcaster Jim Nantz, comments that were directed at Colts head coach Shane Steichen. During the live broadcast of the Colts–Texans game, Nantz delivered commentary that many Colts fans interpreted as dismissive and lacking proper respect toward Steichen — particularly given the context of a head coach still in the process of shaping a new identity for the franchise. Those remarks quickly circulated across social media platforms, igniting heated debate within Colts Nation. Only a few hours after the broadcast concluded, Rivers — a figure deeply connected to the Colts’ culture and values — responded. While he did not address the matter in a formal press conference, Rivers reportedly made his position clear: he disagreed with the way Nantz characterized Steichen’s work and stressed that the Colts’ head coach deserves greater respect from national media voices. Rivers’ response immediately drew attention across the league. As one of the most recognizable quarterbacks in modern Colts history, his voice carries weight, often viewed as a reflection of the organization’s core principles. To Rivers, this was not simply about defending one individual — it was about standing up for the professionalism, accountability, and respect that define the Colts’ culture. Many Colts supporters echoed that sentiment, arguing that Nantz’s remarks failed to acknowledge the broader context surrounding Steichen’s leadership and the progress being made behind the scenes. Social media quickly filled with messages backing Rivers, alongside criticism aimed at Nantz for what fans felt crossed the line from analysis into unfair dismissal. The situation has since sparked a wider conversation throughout NFL circles regarding the responsibility of veteran broadcasters when evaluating coaches and organizations still in transitional phases. While criticism is an inherent part of sports media, many believe it must be balanced with context and respect — especially when discussing figures tasked with long-term development rather than instant results. Though the Colts–Texans game itself concluded as scheduled, the postgame discourse extended well beyond the final whistle. What unfolded off the field became a reminder that figures like Philip Rivers remain willing to speak out when they believe the foundational values of the Indianapolis Colts — respect, professionalism, and integrity — are being overlooked.