BREAKING: Mac Jones is staying in San Francisco, even as other teams reportedly reached out with competitive trade offers.

In the aftermath of the 2026 Super Bowl halftime performance, a heated backlash has emerged from parts of the NFL community — including former Philadelphia Eagles standout Seth Joyner — directed at entertainer Bad Bunny and his widely viewed show. While many fans praised the halftime performance for its artistic creativity and cultural expression, not all reactions were positive. Within 48 hours of the broadcast, several retired NFL players took to social media to voice sharp criticism, arguing that elements of the show crossed a line and were not appropriate for younger viewers. Joyner, a former Pro Bowl linebacker and key defensive figure for the Philadelphia Eagles during the late 1980s and early 1990s, reportedly expressed concern that the Super Bowl — traditionally seen as a family event — should prioritize content suitable for audiences of all ages. His comments quickly gained traction online, fueling widespread debate among fans and commentators. Other former players echoed similar sentiments. One retired Pro Bowler wrote that the Super Bowl once celebrated “football, family, and fun,” but has now become increasingly controversial. Critics cited specific segments of the performance they described as suggestive or socially provocative, claiming such moments could “confuse” or negatively influence younger viewers. They want to turn your kids gay. pic.twitter.com/ntbOLqSfaZ — JohnRocker (@itsJohnRocker) February 9, 2026 Supporters of Bad Bunny, however, were quick to push back. Many emphasized that artistic expression is inherently subjective and that interpretations of the performance depend on individual perspectives. Journalists, fans, and some current players defended the show as a reflection of modern American culture and the diversity of today’s audience. As of now, neither Bad Bunny nor the NFL has issued an official response to the criticisms from Joyner and other retired players. Nevertheless, the controversy continues to generate discussion across sports talk shows, social media platforms, and fan communities nationwide. What began as a halftime entertainment segment has evolved into a broader conversation about the intersection of sports, culture, and generational values. And as the 2026 offseason unfolds, the debate surrounding the performance shows little sign of fading anytime soon.