Logo

Broncos Are Expected to Lock Up John Franklin-Myers With a Massive Deal Before Free Agency

As the 2026 offseason approaches, the Denver Broncos find themselves at a familiar crossroads — deciding whether to pay a premium to keep a core defensive piece or risk losing him to a market eager to spend. This time, the name at the center of that decision is John Franklin-Myers, whose value has quietly surged league-wide.

Article image

Franklin-Myers is scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent next month, but many around the league believe Denver has little incentive to let the situation reach that point. In a defensive line market thin on true impact interior players, his leverage is stronger than it appears on the surface.

Analysts at Pro Football Focus have already projected Franklin-Myers to command a deal in the range of three years and $45 million, a figure that would place him near the top of the 2026 interior defensive free-agent class. The reasoning is simple: scarcity drives price, and disruptive interior rushers are increasingly rare.

Since arriving in Denver via trade from the New York Jets in 2024, Franklin-Myers has delivered exactly what the Broncos hoped for. Over 33 games, he produced 14.5 sacks, 33 quarterback hits, and 14 tackles for loss, while setting a career high with 7.5 sacks in 2025. His impact consistently showed up beyond the box score, particularly in how often opposing quarterbacks were forced off their spots.

What separates Franklin-Myers from many interior defenders is efficiency. Over the past two seasons, he ranked in the 96th percentile among interior linemen in both pass-rush grade and pass-rush win rate. Those metrics reinforce what film already suggests: he wins quickly, collapses pockets, and changes protections before the snap.

From Denver’s perspective, the complication is financial. The Broncos have already committed significant resources to players like Nik Bonitto, Zach Allen, and Patrick Surtain II, tightening their margin for error under the cap. Yet internally, there is growing belief that replacing Franklin-Myers would be more costly than retaining him.

When my time comes, it comes.

That brief remark, made late in the season, reflected an understanding of the business side of the league. But it also underscored the reality that Franklin-Myers knows his market — and so do the Broncos.

If Denver allows him to reach free agency, teams such as the Houston Texans are expected to pursue him aggressively. For a defense built around pressure and disruption, Franklin-Myers fits seamlessly.

For the Broncos, the calculus is becoming clearer. Acting early may be the only way to control the outcome. A decisive extension would not only secure a cornerstone of their defensive front, but also prevent a bidding war that could quickly push his price even higher.

"Nobody's taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold": Colin Cowherd shakes up NFC QB hierarchy with bold take on Seahawks star after Super Bowl win
Seattle, Washington   In the wake of the Seattle Seahawks’ triumphant 29–13 win over the New England Patriots in Super Bowl LX, national analyst Colin Cowherd delivered one of the boldest quarterback takes of the offseason — and it has stirred debate across the league. "If you're building a franchise... in the NFC what quarterback do you take over Sam Darnold? Nobody's taking Brock Purdy... Nobody's taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold."Where does Darnold rank after the Super Bowl win? @colincowherd weighs in pic.twitter.com/lKAVOplAeS — Herd w/Colin Cowherd (@TheHerd) February 9, 2026 On his popular show Monday, Cowherd elevated Sam Darnold — Seattle’s Super Bowl-winning signal-caller — above several established NFC quarterbacks in his unofficial “hierarchy.” Most notably, the radio host declared that “nobody’s taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold” in today’s landscape, placing Darnold ahead of the Jalen Hurts of the Philadelphia Eagles as a franchise cornerstone. Cowherd’s argument leans heavily on Darnold’s unlikely resurgence this season. After signing a three-year, $100.5 million contract with Seattle in March 2025, Darnold led the franchise to its second Lombardi Trophy — ending a long personal career journey that included stints with multiple teams and frequent skepticism about his long-term viability. “You guys have all, for the last couple of years, been trying to tell me Brock Purdy and Jalen Hurts are top 10 quarterbacks. … What quarterback in the NFC tomorrow, if you’re building a franchise, do you take over Sam Darnold? Nobody’s taking Brock Purdy. Injuries. Smaller. Not a GM in the league is taking Brock Purdy. Not a single GM. Nobody’s taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold.” Cowherd’s stance isn’t just revisionist fan talk — it’s rooted in the tangible results from Seattle’s season. Darnold took a franchise that had not hoisted a Super Bowl in over a decade and guided it to a championship with a measured, turnover-free performance in the title game. Meanwhile, Hurts, coming off his own Super Bowl victory in 2024, has long been viewed as one of the NFC’s elite QBs and was recently ranked among the top 20 players in the NFL Top 100 for 2025. The debate highlights a larger discussion around how quarterbacks are evaluated in today’s NFL — raw wins and championships versus traditional stat lines and physical tools. Critics of Cowherd’s take argue that Hurts’ consistency and dual-threat ability remain elite, while defenders of Darnold point to durability, adaptability, and ultimately, winning at the highest level when it mattered most. Whatever side fans land on, Cowherd’s declaration has undeniably shifted the post-Super Bowl narrative. With the NFC landscape evolving and quarterback valuations fluctuating, his bold ranking ensures one thing: the conversation around Sam Darnold — not just as a surprising champion but as a supremely valuable NFC QB — is far from over.