Logo

Chiefs Free Up $35 Million in Cap Space With Three Cuts

There’s no sugarcoating it: the Kansas City Chiefs will face tough roster decisions in 2026, as the team needs to clear over $58 million in cap space before the new league year begins in March. GM Brett Veach can restructure some long-term contracts, but moving on from one or two big-name veterans may also be necessary. Three players stand out as the most obvious cut candidates:

1. RT Jawaan Taylor – Most Likely Cut Candidate
Right tackle Taylor is the most obvious cut candidate heading into 2026. If he does not agree to a pay reduction, releasing him could save the Chiefs $20 million, with a dead cap hit of approximately $7.392 million. While Taylor has been a solid starter, he has faced multiple penalties and has not lived up to the $80 million contract he signed. With rookie Josh Simmons taking over LT, Jaylon Moore potentially filling RT, and Esa Pole emerging as a swing tackle, it’s highly likely the Chiefs will move on from Taylor.

2. DE Mike Danna – Surprise but Plausible Cut
Defensive end Mike Danna, a favorite of DC Steve Spagnuolo, contributes beyond what shows up on stat sheets, but his contract makes him a candidate for a pre-free agency release. Over the Cap projects $8.94 million in cap savings if Danna is cut or traded, compared with just $2.167 million in dead cap. Danna had a career-low 1 sack and 3 tackles for loss in 2025 over 15 games. While restructuring his contract is possible, cutting him remains an option the front office must consider.

3. LB Drue Tranquill – Logical Cut Based on Age and Cap Space
Linebacker True Tranquill, who received a contract extension in 2024 after a strong 2023 season, has become a “luxury” the Chiefs can no longer afford. At 31 years old, the team is looking to get younger at linebacker. Cutting Tranquill would save $6 million, with a minor dead cap of $1.5 million. This move makes financial and strategic sense for roster flexibility.

Adding up the three potential cuts, the Chiefs could free nearly $35 million in cap space. Combined with a few contract restructures, this would allow KC to clear their current $58 million-plus cap space deficit ahead of free agency.

238 views
NFL Playoff Football Is Getting More Expensive — And Carlie Irsay-Gordon’s Comments Have Sparked a League-Wide Reckoning
New York – For generations, the NFL playoffs represented a shared national ritual. Living rooms filled, sports bars overflowed, and entire communities synchronized their weekends around kickoff times. As this year’s Wild Card round arrives, that tradition is being tested. Fans are increasingly discovering that watching every playoff game now requires multiple paid subscriptions, turning what was once a universal experience into an expensive and fragmented one. That frustration moved into the spotlight when Carlie Irsay-Gordon, owner of the Indianapolis Colts, publicly questioned the league’s current media strategy. Her remarks, widely interpreted as a challenge to the direction set by Roger Goodell, ignited debate across the NFL landscape. Fans, analysts, and executives began openly asking whether the league had gone too far in chasing revenue. At the center of the issue is the NFL’s fragmented streaming ecosystem. To watch all Wild Card games, fans may need ESPN, Amazon Prime Video, Peacock, Paramount+, and Fox’s streaming service. Combined, those subscriptions can exceed $85 per month. Many supporters argue that this cost undermines the inclusive spirit that helped make football America’s most popular sport in the first place. Irsay-Gordon’s concerns echo a growing sentiment that the National Football League risks drifting away from its core audience. While massive broadcast deals have driven record profits, critics warn that accessibility matters just as much as financial growth. “Football has always been about bringing people together,” one fan wrote online. “Now it feels like you need a spreadsheet just to figure out where the games are.” That sentiment has resonated widely during playoff week. From a business standpoint, the league’s strategy reflects changing media habits. Younger viewers consume content on mobile devices, and streaming partners offer global reach traditional television cannot match. Distributing games across platforms maximizes rights fees and audience segments. Yet the unintended consequences are clear: casual fans skip games, older viewers feel alienated, and lower-income households are priced out entirely. Amid growing backlash, reports suggest the NFL is considering a league-run streaming platform that could offer select games for free or at reduced cost. The idea remains preliminary, and skepticism persists. Still, the conversation has reached the highest levels. As the playoffs unfold, the drama now extends beyond the field — posing a defining question about whether the NFL can balance profit with principle without losing the fans who built the game.