Logo

Chiefs Urged to ‘Steal’ Top DC to Replace Steve Spagnuolo Amid Defensive Struggles

Kansas City, Missouri – December 17, 2025
For much of the past decade, the Kansas City Chiefs have been defined by stability — especially on defense, where Steve Spagnuolo has served as the architect behind three Super Bowl championships since arriving in 2019. But as the 2025 season spirals toward an uncertain finish, a once-unthinkable conversation is beginning to surface around the league: Is it time for a defensive reset in Kansas City?

The warning signs have been building all season. While the Chiefs’ defense was once viewed as elite, the unit has slipped into the middle tier of the NFL, ranking roughly 15th–18th by Pro Football Focus and yards per play. Explosive plays have crept back in, late-game stops have become inconsistent, and turnovers — once a calling card of Spagnuolo’s scheme — have dried up at critical moments.
Steve Spagnuolo looks to extend his Super Bowl record

That regression was on full display in Week 15’s 16–13 loss to the Chargers, a game Kansas City desperately needed. With Patrick Mahomes sidelined, the margin for error was slim. The defense failed to tilt the field, failed to steal possessions, and ultimately failed to protect a fragile lead. As the Chiefs’ playoff odds hover around 20–30 percent, the pressure has shifted from injuries to accountability.

Spagnuolo’s résumé remains untouchable in franchise history, but even legends aren’t immune to scrutiny when results slide. Around the league, analysts and fans alike have begun asking uncomfortable questions: Has the scheme grown stale? Has the defense lost its trademark aggression? With a talented core that includes Chris Jones, Trent McDuffie, and Nick Bolton, the lack of consistency has fueled the belief that the problem may be structural rather than personnel-based.

That’s where Jim Schwartz enters the conversation.

Despite Cleveland’s disastrous 3–11 record, Schwartz has quietly built one of the NFL’s most dominant defensive units. The Browns currently rank No. 2 overall by PFF, continuing a trend that saw them finish top-eight in recent seasons — all while being handicapped by one of the league’s weakest offenses. Around the NFL, Schwartz is widely regarded as one of the premier defensive minds of his generation.

League observers have described the idea of Kansas City “stealing” Schwartz from Cleveland as a potential home-run move. His philosophy — physical, aggressive, press-man coverage paired with simulated pressures — aligns perfectly with the Chiefs’ personnel. Perhaps most notably, Chris Jones could thrive even further in Schwartz’s system, which prioritizes winning with four and maximizing interior disruption.

There’s also a familiar connection. Schwartz previously worked under Andy Reid in Philadelphia from 2009 to 2012, a relationship that could ease any potential transition. If Cleveland undergoes a full coaching reset after a second straight 3–14 finish, Schwartz may be open to a move — and Kansas City would instantly become one of the league’s most attractive destinations.

If the Chiefs choose to explore alternatives beyond Schwartz, other high-profile candidates loom. Dennard Wilson of the Ravens, whose defense has flirted with the league’s top ranking, and Jesse Minter of the Chargers, one of the NFL’s fastest-rising young coordinators, would both command serious interest.

For now, Steve Spagnuolo remains a respected pillar of the Chiefs’ dynasty. But if Kansas City misses the postseason for the first time in the Mahomes era — even under the shadow of injury — the offseason conversation will be unavoidable.

In a franchise built on relentless evolution, sentiment alone may no longer be enough. And if change does come, many around the league believe Jim Schwartz could be the bold, aggressive answer Kansas City has been missing.

🚨BREAKING: Three Patriots Stars Reject Hall of Fame Ballot in Protest Over Bill Belichick Snub
The NFL world is reeling after a bold decision by three of New England’s legendary players: Rodney Harrison, Vince Wilfork, and Wes Welker. In an unprecedented move, they’ve chosen to forgo future Hall of Fame nominations in protest over the exclusion of Bill Belichick, the coach who defined their careers. Their decision sends a powerful message that goes far beyond personal recognition. It’s not about bitterness. It’s about solidarity. These former Patriots players, who have all been on the fringes of Hall of Fame discussions, are taking a stand against what they see as a grave injustice. By rejecting future nominations, they’re making it clear that individual accolades lose meaning when the architect of their success—Belichick—is left out of the conversation. Rodney Harrison summed up the group’s sentiment in an emotional statement. “He took us to the top. There’s no reason for us to enter the Hall if the man who led us there isn’t allowed in. Whether we’re inducted or not will never diminish his greatness.” Harrison’s words reflect the deep bond they have with their coach and their belief that the Hall’s decision is an insult to the foundation of their success. For Vince Wilfork, a dominant force in the Patriots’ defense, it’s about legacy. “Any honor detached from Belichick’s leadership feels incomplete,” he reportedly said. The Hall of Fame, he believes, fails to capture the true essence of their achievements without recognizing the coach who guided them through it all. Wes Welker, long debated for his Hall of Fame candidacy, shares the same perspective. The statistics and accolades, he argues, are secondary when you ignore the context that made them possible. His respect for Belichick’s influence makes any honor feel incomplete without his recognition. This quiet protest is a challenge to the very credibility of the Hall of Fame’s voting process. If the Hall can overlook the most successful coach of the modern era, these players ask, what exactly does induction represent? It raises a critical question: Is the Hall of Fame truly about merit, or is it shaped by personal grudges and biases? Ultimately, this move isn’t about gold jackets or busts. For these former Patriots stars, loyalty to Bill Belichick trumps any individual honor the Hall of Fame might offer. As Harrison put it, “Diminishing his greatness? Never.” For them, Belichick’s legacy stands firm, with or without the Hall of Fame’s approval.