Logo

Chris Jones Rejects Bears' Offer Amid Chiefs’ Financial Pressure, Proposes New Deal to Help Chiefs Manage Cap Stra

Kansas City, Missouri

In a surprising turn of events, All-Pro defensive tackle Chris Jones has rejected the Chicago Bears' trade offer, citing the financial difficulties the Kansas City Chiefs are currently facing. The Chiefs’ ongoing salary cap struggles have forced Jones to consider alternative solutions, with the star pass rusher proposing a restructuring of his contract to help ease the financial burden on his team while keeping his base salary intact.

Jones, 32, is one of the most dominant interior defenders in the NFL, but his current contract, which includes a hefty $35 million cap hit in 2026, has created significant challenges for the Chiefs as they look to manage their cap space. With the Chiefs already dealing with an overextended budget, Jones' proposed restructuring aims to give Kansas City more flexibility in the short term without sacrificing his compensation.
Article image

Instead of a traditional contract that would burden the team with a massive cap hit in a single season, Jones has suggested a new deal that would maintain his current salary but extend the payment over a longer period, breaking it into smaller installments. This approach would spread the financial burden over multiple years, providing the Chiefs with more immediate relief while still compensating Jones at the level he deserves.

The Chiefs’ financial difficulties are not new, as the team is currently navigating a tight cap situation. The proposed restructure would allow Kansas City to retain Jones, a key player in their defense, while freeing up valuable cap space to address other areas of need. If the Chiefs agree to Jones' proposal, it could pave the way for the team to retain the dominant pass rusher while also staying competitive in the upcoming seasons.

Although Jones initially garnered interest from the Bears, who were eager to bolster their defensive line, the financial implications of such a trade would have made it difficult for them to fit his contract under their own cap space. With Jones opting to stay with the Chiefs, the focus now shifts to whether Kansas City will accept his proposed restructure or risk losing one of their most valuable assets.

As the offseason progresses, the Chiefs will need to weigh their options carefully. Retaining Jones while keeping their cap situation manageable will require a delicate balancing act. Jones’ proposal offers a potential solution, allowing him to remain with the Chiefs and continue his role as a cornerstone of their defense, while simultaneously helping the team navigate their financial constraints.

For now, it remains to be seen whether the Chiefs will agree to the restructure. However, Jones' willingness to work with the team to ease their cap difficulties speaks to his commitment to staying in Kansas City and continuing his successful career with the franchise.

Right After Super Bowl Media Night, Jason Kelce’s Public Stance Sparked a $70 Million Fallout
February, 2026 Right after Super Bowl media night on Monday, Jason Kelce did what nobody in his circle expected: he grabbed the mic and fully backed NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell’s decision to invite the “Tití Me Preguntó” singer for halftime — no hedging, no “both sides,” just loyalty. Within hours, that loyalty began to look expensive. Sponsors who loved Kelce’s typically neutral stance suddenly saw a brand risk, and executives who had promised long-term partnerships went silent. By sunrise, insiders were whispering a number that sounded unreal: $70 million lost. The flashpoint wasn’t a press conference or a tweet — it was Kelce’s own podcast, where he doubled down in front of his most devoted listeners. He praised Goodell’s “vision,” dismissed the backlash as “performative,” and insisted the league should chase culture as aggressively as trophies. That episode triggered the dominoes. The platform hosting his show reportedly flagged the segment for “policy violations” and pulled distribution. Then came the email nobody wants: immediate termination. Overnight, Kelce didn’t just lose reach — he lost the entire channel that carried his voice. Sources close to the business side say the cancellation ignited a clause cascade: ad buys frozen, bonuses voided, and future guarantees evaporated. What had been a seven-figure monthly machine turned into a legal fight. Kelce’s team now calls it a coordinated punishment campaign. Now the story has morphed from entertainment debate into a cautionary NFL tale: pick a side, and pay the bill. Kelce still insists he made the right call, but the damage is undeniable — one public endorsement, one podcast episode, and $70 million vanished.