Logo

Head Coach Mike Tomlin Takes Full Responsibility After Unwarranted Loss to Bears – And the “Secret List of 5 Names” That Has Steelers Nation Filled With Regret

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – 11/25/2025

The Pittsburgh Steelers are inching dangerously close to what many fans are calling another disappointing season. After the 31–28 loss to the Chicago Bears — a game they controlled but let slip away — head coach Mike Tomlin finally broke his silence, stepping onto the press podium with a determined look and the full weight of responsibility on his shoulders.

Tomlin avoiding the angst of Steelers' new offense | News, Sports, Jobs -  Altoona Mirror

No excuses. No deflection. Tomlin spoke directly, in a press room packed with frustration and doubt:

“There’s no one to blame but me. The inconsistency, the slow adjustments, the way we let the game slip away in critical moments — it all starts with me. I have to be better, the Steelers have to be better, and if any major changes need to happen to return this team to where it belongs, I will be the first to take responsibility.”

The quote spread rapidly across social media, marking one of the rare moments Tomlin publicly acknowledged the severity of the team’s current situation.

But what came next shook Steelers Nation even more.
According to ESPN, during an emergency strategy meeting that lasted over two hours after the game, the front office presented a list of five players the organization now believes they “should never have let go” — players who, if still in Pittsburgh, might have changed the entire trajectory of the season.

The list, which immediately went viral, included:

  1. George Pickens – now second in the NFL in receiving yards with the Cowboys.

  • Najee Harris – believed to have left far too early with untapped value.

  • Pat Freiermuth – a tight end viewed as the future before injuries derailed everything.

  • Bud Dupree – a pass-rush anchor the Steelers have yet to truly replace.

  • Kendrick Green – departed right at the moment he began to break out.

  • Once leaked, the list ignited a storm. Thousands of comments poured in across social media, all sharing the same emotions: regret, frustration, and disbelief. It became painfully clear that the Steelers hadn’t just lost a game — they may have lost the foundation of what could have been a competitive future.

    Still, Tomlin continued to stand in the center of the storm, showing the same unshakeable demeanor that has defined nearly two decades of leadership in Pittsburgh.

    He closed his press conference with a promise:

    “We’re going to fix this. Starting with me, starting in the meeting rooms, and starting right now.”

    For the Steelers, the 2025 season is no longer simply a playoff chase.
    It may be the defining crossroads of the Mike Tomlin era — a chapter still being written… or possibly nearing its final pages.

    Eric Bieniemy, Legend OC in Bears History, Arrives in Chiefs and Immediately Submits Plan to Cut Two Key Offensive Names – Clark Hunt’ Response Shocks the NFL
    Kansas City, Missouri — January 2026 The return was expected to feel familiar. Instead, it sent shockwaves across the league. When Eric Bieniemy — widely regarded as one of the most influential offensive minds of the modern era and a legendary offensive coordinator figure in Chicago Bears history — officially arrived back in Kansas City, few anticipated his first move would ignite controversy throughout the NFL. But within hours of stepping inside Arrowhead Stadium, Bieniemy made one thing clear: this was not a nostalgia tour. According to multiple league sources, Bieniemy immediately submitted a formal offensive restructuring plan to Chiefs leadership, calling for the removal of two key offensive names: Isiah Pacheco and Kareem Hunt. No delays. No gradual transition. One decisive move. The proposal stunned those inside the building. Pacheco has embodied physical intensity and relentless energy in recent seasons, while Hunt’s presence carried emotional weight and deep locker-room respect. But Bieniemy’s assessment was blunt: the issue was not effort or legacy — it was fit, sustainability, and long-term offensive direction. Sources described the decision as a calculated psychological reset, designed to send an unmistakable message throughout the locker room: the offense would now be built around precision, adaptability, and long-term balance, not familiarity. During his first closed-door meeting with team leadership, Bieniemy reportedly spoke with trademark intensity: “The NFL doesn’t reward comfort. I don’t care how hard you run or what you meant to this team yesterday — if the system can’t evolve with you in it, then the system comes first. We’re not here to preserve memories. We’re building something that lasts.” That moment forced a defining response from Chiefs chairman Clark Hunt — and this is where the situation escalated even further. Rather than pushing back, Hunt approved the authority behind the plan. According to sources present, Hunt made it clear that Bieniemy was not brought back to Kansas City to maintain continuity, but to challenge it. His response — calm, measured, and decisive — shocked even veteran NFL executives. “If we’re asking Eric to set a new standard, we can’t flinch the moment it gets uncomfortable,” one team source paraphrased Hunt as saying. Inside the locker room, reactions were intense and divided. Some veterans were blindsided. Younger players viewed the move as a clear signal that no role is guaranteed. What once felt like a familiar environment quickly turned competitive, urgent, and demanding. Across the NFL, front offices are watching closely. Some view Bieniemy’s move as reckless. Others believe it was long overdue. What is undeniable is this: Kansas City’s offense is entering a new era, one defined by adaptability over attachment. This is not a soft recalibration.This is a hard offensive reset. Eric Bieniemy has drawn his line. Clark Hunt has backed him. And with two cornerstone names suddenly at the center of league-wide debate, the Chiefs have made one thing unmistakably clear: The past will be respected — but it will not dictate the future.