Logo

Head coach Mike Vrabel angrily criticizes officiating crew led by Shawn Smith after a “no-call” decision when Stefon Diggs was assaulted by Seahawks’ Josh Jobe right in front of the officials during Super Bowl LX

Santa Clara, California – Super Bowl LX, held on February 8, 2026 at Levi’s Stadium, ended with a 13–29 loss for the New England Patriots against the Seattle Seahawks. But beyond the final score, the game left behind a fierce controversy surrounding officiating during one of the most critical moments of the NFL’s championship stage.

The center of the outrage stemmed from a play in the fourth quarter, as the Patriots were pushing for late points in an effort to mount a comeback. Stefon Diggs was forcefully shoved out of bounds by Seahawks cornerback Josh Jobe, before the two engaged in a brief hand-to-hand altercation that immediately triggered an angry reaction from the Patriots’ sideline.

Multiple videos circulating on X showed Jobe allegedly throwing the first punch, while officials stood very close to the play and failed to throw a flag. One referee was even seen appearing to reach for his flag before ultimately ruling a no-call — no penalty, no ejection — completely halting the Patriots’ drive.

That decision instantly ignited fury across the fanbase. On X, countless posts labeled the officials “blind” and “worthless,” arguing that Diggs was openly assaulted right in front of referees without any form of protection. Hashtags such as #SuperBowlLX, #NFLDrama, and #Seahawks quickly surged in engagement, reflecting a growing loss of faith in the fairness of the game.

Article image

On the sideline, Mike Vrabel could not hide his anger. After the game, he openly criticized the officiating crew led by Shawn Smith. “This was one of the worst-officiated Super Bowls I’ve seen in a very long time. One of our players gets hit right in front of the officials, on the biggest stage in the NFL, and there is absolutely no response. That’s unacceptable.”

The play did not only spark questions of fairness, but also directly impacted the flow of the game. The Patriots’ drive was cut short at the exact moment they desperately needed momentum, while the Seahawks continued to control the contest behind a defense widely described as “ferocious” throughout the night.

Although it did not alter the Seahawks’ championship result, the “dirty shot on Stefon Diggs” has become a defining symbol of the controversies surrounding Super Bowl LX. For many, the game will be remembered not only for the victory, but for the lingering questions about officiating on one of the biggest stages in American sports.

"Nobody's taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold": Colin Cowherd shakes up NFC QB hierarchy with bold take on Seahawks star after Super Bowl win
Seattle, Washington   In the wake of the Seattle Seahawks’ triumphant 29–13 win over the New England Patriots in Super Bowl LX, national analyst Colin Cowherd delivered one of the boldest quarterback takes of the offseason — and it has stirred debate across the league. "If you're building a franchise... in the NFC what quarterback do you take over Sam Darnold? Nobody's taking Brock Purdy... Nobody's taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold."Where does Darnold rank after the Super Bowl win? @colincowherd weighs in pic.twitter.com/lKAVOplAeS — Herd w/Colin Cowherd (@TheHerd) February 9, 2026 On his popular show Monday, Cowherd elevated Sam Darnold — Seattle’s Super Bowl-winning signal-caller — above several established NFC quarterbacks in his unofficial “hierarchy.” Most notably, the radio host declared that “nobody’s taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold” in today’s landscape, placing Darnold ahead of the Jalen Hurts of the Philadelphia Eagles as a franchise cornerstone. Cowherd’s argument leans heavily on Darnold’s unlikely resurgence this season. After signing a three-year, $100.5 million contract with Seattle in March 2025, Darnold led the franchise to its second Lombardi Trophy — ending a long personal career journey that included stints with multiple teams and frequent skepticism about his long-term viability. “You guys have all, for the last couple of years, been trying to tell me Brock Purdy and Jalen Hurts are top 10 quarterbacks. … What quarterback in the NFC tomorrow, if you’re building a franchise, do you take over Sam Darnold? Nobody’s taking Brock Purdy. Injuries. Smaller. Not a GM in the league is taking Brock Purdy. Not a single GM. Nobody’s taking Jalen Hurts over Sam Darnold.” Cowherd’s stance isn’t just revisionist fan talk — it’s rooted in the tangible results from Seattle’s season. Darnold took a franchise that had not hoisted a Super Bowl in over a decade and guided it to a championship with a measured, turnover-free performance in the title game. Meanwhile, Hurts, coming off his own Super Bowl victory in 2024, has long been viewed as one of the NFC’s elite QBs and was recently ranked among the top 20 players in the NFL Top 100 for 2025. The debate highlights a larger discussion around how quarterbacks are evaluated in today’s NFL — raw wins and championships versus traditional stat lines and physical tools. Critics of Cowherd’s take argue that Hurts’ consistency and dual-threat ability remain elite, while defenders of Darnold point to durability, adaptability, and ultimately, winning at the highest level when it mattered most. Whatever side fans land on, Cowherd’s declaration has undeniably shifted the post-Super Bowl narrative. With the NFC landscape evolving and quarterback valuations fluctuating, his bold ranking ensures one thing: the conversation around Sam Darnold — not just as a surprising champion but as a supremely valuable NFC QB — is far from over.