Logo

Just 1 Hour After Learning He's No Longer in the Plans, Bears' $64 Million Star CB Is Willing to Restructure His Contract — All for One More Chance to Wear Chicago Colors.

Chicago, Illinois – January 5, 2026

The message arrived fast.
Nahshon Wright’s response came even faster.

Just one hour after learning that he was no longer a priority in the Chicago Bears’ long-term plans, cornerback Nahshon Wright reached out to team leadership with a stunning proposal: he is willing to restructure his $64 million contract — not to secure an exit, but to earn one more chance to fight in a Bears uniform.

This wasn’t talk. It was action from a player who understands his value — and refuses to be defined by a turbulent stretch.

Article image

Wright is not an anonymous name. Over his NFL career, he has been viewed as a rare physical specimen at cornerback (nearly 6-foot-4), with elite length, strength, and the ability to contest the ball at the catch point. Earlier this season, he put the league on notice in Week 1 with a 74-yard interception return for a touchdown, one of the most explosive defensive highlights of opening week.

In Chicago, Wright has delivered stretches of game-by-game, Pro Bowl–caliber play, flashing tight press coverage, sharp route recognition, and a knack for creating turnovers in pivotal moments. He finished the season with five interceptions, among the team leaders — a number that cannot be dismissed at his position.

But the NFL doesn’t live on highlights alone. And with the postseason approaching, Chicago has shifted its focus toward consistency and reliability.

Following the Bears’ 19–16 loss to the Lions, internal evaluations centered on three priorities: trust, discipline, and coaching confidence. Wright understood that his role was suddenly uncertain — and chose to confront that reality head-on.

According to sources, Wright is open to:

  • Converting guaranteed money

  • Reworking salary into performance-based incentives

  • Accepting a reduced role, if necessary

  • All for one goal: the chance to keep competing.

    “If Chicago no longer sees me as the priority option, I’m willing to step back — not to walk away, but to stay and keep fighting,” Wright said to those close to him.
    “I can restructure my deal, accept any role, as long as I still get the chance to step on the field and show who I really am. The Bears aren’t just where I play — they’re where I still want to put my heart and my career until the very end.”

    Chicago’s secondary still features long-term cornerstones like Jaylon Johnson and Tyrique Stevenson, with younger options waiting in the wings. No promises have been made.

    But inside Halas Hall, Wright’s willingness to sacrifice has not gone unnoticed. In a league where contracts are often protected before pride, choosing the jersey over the money is rare.

    Whether the Bears accept the restructure remains uncertain. But the timing — just one hour after the door appeared to be closing — said everything.

    Nahshon Wright isn’t ready for his Chicago chapter to end quietly.

    And in an NFL driven by guarantees and leverage, a player betting on belief, identity, and opportunity may be the most compelling gamble of all.

    988 views
    Legendary Chiefs Tony Gonzalez Says Kansas City Chiefs Have Secured Most Lopsided Stadium Deal in NFL History
    Kansas City, Missouri – January 10, 2026 NFL legend and Hall of Fame tight end Tony Gonzalez has weighed in on the recent Kansas City Chiefs stadium agreement, calling it “the most lopsided deal in NFL history.” According to Gonzalez, the agreement heavily favors the Chiefs while placing the majority of the financial burden on public funds, setting a precedent rarely seen in professional sports. The deal, which allows the Chiefs to receive $1.8 billion in public funding to construct a $3 billion state-of-the-art stadium in Kansas, has drawn national attention and criticism. Gonzalez emphasized that the structure of the agreement grants the franchise unprecedented control over revenue streams, including ticket sales, luxury suites, concessions, and naming rights, while limiting the state’s influence to a handful of minor restrictions. “This isn’t just a stadium deal — it’s a statement about the organization’s leverage and the influence a franchise can wield in today’s NFL,” Gonzalez said. “The Chiefs are securing their future for decades, and the scale of public contribution is unprecedented.” Gonzalez also highlighted the long-term implications: the stadium lease ensures Chiefs’ occupancy for 30 years with multiple renewal options, effectively locking in the team for up to 60 years. “This deal sets a standard that other franchises will be looking at, for better or worse,” he added. While some praise the project for its ambition and the promise of a cutting-edge fan experience, critics argue that the deal raises questions about the fairness of taxpayer-funded stadiums and the balance between public investment and franchise benefit. Gonzalez concluded, “From an organizational standpoint, it’s brilliant. From a public perspective, it’s contentious. But there’s no denying the Chiefs have achieved something historically significant in the NFL landscape.” The discussion over the Kansas City stadium deal continues to ripple across sports media, with Gonzalez’s endorsement adding weight to the ongoing debate about stadium financing and franchise power in professional football.