Logo

Not an Injury, Not a Tactical Decision — Here Is the Real Reason a Veteran LT Was Removed From the Lineup Before a Crucial Playoff-Defining Clash With the 49ers: One Offensive Remark Toward a Black Female Custodian

Indianapolis — On the eve of a season-defining matchup between the Indianapolis Colts and the San Francisco 49ers, the Colts were forced to make a stunning and uncomfortable decision. Veteran left tackle Bernhard Raimann will be inactive — not because of injury, and not due to any on-field schematic adjustment.

Instead, the Colts confirmed that Raimann was removed from the lineup as part of an internal disciplinary action following an incident during a recent practice session.

According to multiple sources with knowledge of the situation, the incident involved an interaction between Raimann and a Black female custodian working at the team’s practice facility. The situation reportedly began when the employee accidentally soiled part of Raimann’s practice gear. What followed, according to those sources, was a remark described as both racially and sexually offensive, prompting immediate concern within the organization.

Article image

Team officials have not publicly repeated the language involved, but the Colts acknowledged that the alleged comment violated the franchise’s standards of conduct and workplace respect. The matter is currently under internal review, and the team emphasized that the decision to hold Raimann out was made swiftly and deliberately.

The timing could not be more consequential. Indianapolis enters the matchup against San Francisco with its playoff hopes hanging by a thread. Raimann has been a key piece of the offensive line, and his absence against one of the NFL’s most aggressive defensive fronts will have immediate on-field implications.

Yet within the Colts’ building, leadership viewed the situation as non-negotiable.

Head coach Shane Steichen addressed the matter briefly, choosing his words carefully but firmly:

“There are standards in this organization that do not bend under pressure. Any behavior that undermines respect, dignity, or basic human values has no place here — regardless of role, status, or timing.”

Article image

The Colts declined to comment on whether further discipline could follow, or whether the league has been formally notified, though sources indicate the NFL is aware of the situation and monitoring developments.

Around the league, the decision has sparked conversation not about football, but about accountability. Removing a starting left tackle on the eve of a must-win game is not symbolic — it is costly. But it also sends a clear message: culture is not situational.

As Indianapolis prepares to face the 49ers without one of its core linemen, the organization finds itself navigating two battles at once — one on the field, and one about the values it is willing to defend when the stakes are highest.

The outcome of the game will be decided in four quarters.
The message from the Colts, however, was delivered long before kickoff.

Travis Kelce and Patrick Mahomes' glitzy steakhouse rocked by lawsuit claiming partners siphoned millions and 'extorted' lawyer as he battled blood cancer
Kansas City, Missouri – January 2026 Travis Kelce and Patrick Mahomes’ trendy Kansas City steakhouse, 1587 Prime, has found itself at the center of a controversy after a lawsuit alleged that its business partners, Tosh Berman and Michael Tanha, siphoned millions of dollars from the company and “extorted” their legal counsel during a critical time when the attorney was fighting blood cancer. The lawsuit, filed by Matthew Syken, the former general counsel of the restaurant’s parent company Noble 33, claims that Berman and Tanha engaged in fraudulent activity while Syken was on medical leave for cancer treatment. According to Syken, the two allegedly misappropriated funds from a deal with a gift card company, inKind, which had paid Noble 33 millions in advance for store credits redeemable at their chain of restaurants. Syken claims that after he uncovered the financial irregularities and confronted Berman and Tanha, they retaliated by withholding his pay, firing him, and canceling his medical insurance during his recovery. He further accuses them of threatening his legal career in an attempt to silence him, adding to the emotional and financial strain he was already facing. “I had no choice but to speak up. I’ve been through enough, and I thought it was my responsibility to make sure Noble 33 was operating fairly. To be fired in such a cruel manner, especially while fighting cancer, is something I’ll never forget. The truth needs to come out,” Syken stated. Kelce and Mahomes, both of whom have had stakes in 1587 Prime, have not been named as defendants in the lawsuit, and sources close to the two superstars say they were unaware of the alleged misconduct. Despite the controversy, Kelce and Mahomes have continued to promote the restaurant as a high-end destination for fans and celebrities alike. The lawsuit, which has gained significant media attention, claims that Berman and Tanha used the inKind gift card deal to generate upfront cash that was allegedly funneled into their private accounts, while Syken’s attempts to uncover the scheme were met with hostility. Berman and Tanha have denied all wrongdoing, accusing Syken of embezzling funds himself, but the lawsuit continues to unfold as the legal battle intensifies. With a history of Super Bowl victories and major endorsements, both Kelce and Mahomes now find themselves linked to a serious legal battle that threatens the future of their restaurant venture. As the case progresses, many are wondering whether 1587 Prime can withstand the controversy and whether the public image of the two stars will be affected by the ongoing legal issues.