Logo

Rams Owner Stan Kroenke Calls for NFL Rule Change After Controversial Play That Helped Seahawks Secure Decisive Victory

The echoes of Week 16 are still being heard across the league. While the Seattle Seahawks celebrate their Super Bowl LX triumph, Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke has shifted the conversation toward accountability — and possibly, reform.

At the center of the controversy is a two-point conversion that dramatically altered the Rams-Seahawks late-season showdown. With under seven minutes remaining, Seattle executed a play initially ruled incomplete before replay determined it was a backward pass — keeping the ball live. The recovery in the end zone tied the game and ultimately paved the way for a Seahawks overtime victory.

Article image

For Kroenke, the issue isn’t bitterness. It’s clarity.

“The league has to ensure competitive integrity. If a rule creates confusion at the most critical moment of a season, we have to examine it.”

That single decision shifted playoff seeding. Instead of the Rams potentially securing positioning, Seattle captured the NFC’s No. 1 seed — and with it, home-field advantage. Weeks later, the Seahawks would defeat the Rams again in the NFC Championship Game before dominating the Patriots 29-13 in the Super Bowl.

No one in Los Angeles disputes that Seattle earned its championship. But Kroenke believes the circumstances warrant review. Sources indicate the Rams are preparing a formal proposal to the NFL Competition Committee aimed at clarifying live-ball rulings on backward passes during conversion attempts.

League officials have not publicly responded, but discussions are expected during the annual owners’ meetings. Around the NFL, opinions are split. Some argue the rule was applied correctly. Others believe technicalities should not determine postseason destinies.

For Seattle, the moment has become part of championship lore — a symbol of resilience and execution under pressure. For Los Angeles, it remains a turning point that reshaped the NFC landscape.

“This isn’t about one team,” Kroenke added. “It’s about making sure the game is decided by performance — not ambiguity.”

In a league built on inches and instant replay, the smallest interpretations can change everything. The Seahawks climbed the mountain. The Rams now want to reshape the path.

And the NFL may soon decide whether that controversial play becomes history — or a catalyst for change.

Former Bears Starter Expresses Interest in Green Bay — Fans Speculate Revenge Motive
GREEN BAY, Wisconsin - 25/02/2026 In one of the most unexpected offseason storylines, former Chicago Bears starting quarterback Justin Fields has reportedly expressed openness to joining the rival Green Bay Packers — a development that has ignited fierce debate across NFC North fan bases. Sources close to the situation indicate Fields would welcome the opportunity if Green Bay comes calling. With the Packers potentially searching for a backup behind Jordan Love, the connection has fueled speculation that Fields could land in Titletown. Naturally, Bears fans were quick to interpret the possibility as something deeper. Social media exploded with theories that Fields might be motivated by a desire to prove Chicago wrong — or even “get revenge” on the franchise that drafted him 11th overall in 2021 before ultimately moving on. However, there is little public evidence to suggest personal animosity. When Fields unfollowed the Bears on Instagram prior to his trade last year, some fans viewed it as a sign of frustration. Others dismissed it as typical “Instagram noise.” Fields never commented publicly, and the moment faded without escalation. Following his move to Pittsburgh in 2024, Fields did make comments praising the Steelers’ “culture,” which some Bears fans interpreted as a subtle comparison. Yet the remarks were measured and professional — not a direct criticism of Chicago’s organization. In fact, there has been no documented toxic conflict between Fields and Bears leadership. General manager Ryan Poles personally informed him of the trade decision, and Fields publicly praised the professionalism of the process. Unlike past quarterback situations in Chicago, there were no reports of locker-room drama or organizational feuds. Still, perception often outweighs reality in rivalry markets. Many analysts and segments of the Bears fan base have argued that Chicago mishandled Fields’ development — citing inconsistent coaching changes, offensive line struggles, and the decision to draft Caleb Williams rather than build further around him. But notably, Fields himself has remained silent in those debates. If he were to join Green Bay, the move would instantly intensify the historic rivalry between the Bears and Packers. The narrative would practically write itself: former Chicago starter wearing green and gold, potentially lining up against his old team. Whether fueled by opportunity, professional growth, or competitive fire, one thing is certain — any hint of Justin Fields in a Packers uniform would dominate headlines across the NFC North. For now, it remains speculation. But in a rivalry built on history, pride, and long memories, even the possibility is enough to set the football world buzzing.