Logo

Steelers Issue Ultimatum to Young OLB with Over 350 Career Tackles – “Restructure or Be Gone” After Disappointing 2025 Season

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania – December 2, 2025

The Pittsburgh Steelers have once again sent a powerful message to their locker room — and this time, the player at the center of the storm is OLB Alex Highsmith, the owner of more than 350 career tackles and once considered the perfect long-term partner to T.J. Watt. After a quiet and inconsistent 2025 campaign, the Steelers have delivered a direct warning: either restructure his contract or leave Pittsburgh.

According to ESPN Pittsburgh, the meeting between team executives and Highsmith’s representatives took place immediately after the Week 12 loss. There, the Steelers laid out a blunt assessment: Highsmith’s production no longer matches his current cap hit. His sack totals have dipped, his pressure rate has wavered, and his on-field leadership has not met internal expectations.

Steelers OLB Alex Highsmith (ankle) to miss Ravens showdown - ESPN

Highsmith, 28, once looked like a rising star after a breakout 2022 season with 14.5 sacks. But the three years that followed have raised concerns — inconsistency, a lack of explosive plays, and extended stretches where he disappears when Watt is limited or absent. The Steelers believe this regression has directly hindered the effectiveness of their defense.

With tight cap space and several roster needs, Pittsburgh chose clarity over diplomacy.

General manager Omar Khan addressed the media today with a statement that carried unmistakable weight:

“In Pittsburgh, we don’t hand out contracts because of reputation or nostalgia. We evaluate players based on what they deliver today and tomorrow, not on stats from years ago. And if anyone thinks they can live off the past forever… they’re going to face reality sooner than they expect.”

According to ESPN, the front office has given Highsmith two concrete options:
either agree to restructure his deal to reduce his cap hit, or the Steelers will entertain all trade offers at season’s end.

Still, team sources insist the Steelers don’t want to move on from Highsmith — if he’s willing to adjust. Despite recent struggles, he remains an experienced defender with more than 350 tackles, over 35 career sacks, and a history of delivering clutch moments early in his tenure.

But the NFL waits for no one. No team pays for what someone used to be. The Steelers understand that — and now Highsmith must confront the same reality.

Pittsburgh has spoken.
Now the future of Alex Highsmith lies entirely in his hands.

U.S. Turns Kharg Island into a 'Bargaining Chip' to Force Iran to Reopen the Strait of Hormuz?
March 14, 2026 – 3:00 PMDân trí – A former U.S. military official has not ruled out the possibility that oil prices could spiral out of control if Iran retaliates by attacking oil infrastructure across the Middle East, in response to the U.S. strike on Kharg Island – Iran’s oil lifeline. Kharg Island – Iran’s Oil HeartbeatKharg Island, located approximately 15 nautical miles off Iran's mainland and covering an area of about 22 square kilometers, is considered the economic backbone of the country. It handles up to 90% of Iran’s crude oil exports, totaling around 950 million barrels annually. Known by many Iranians as the “forbidden island,” Kharg is heavily guarded by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), with access restricted to only those with security clearance. Kharg Island Targeted by U.S. MilitaryOn March 14, Kharg became the latest focal point in the ongoing U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict, after U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that American airstrikes had targeted military facilities on the island. The attack marked an escalation in tensions and came as a part of the broader campaign against Iran. Rising Concerns Over Escalating Tensions and Oil Price SurgeOver the past two weeks, Kharg had largely remained untouched by the ongoing attacks. Experts initially believed that occupying or striking the island could require significant ground forces—an option that the U.S. had not yet considered. "Not long ago, at my directive, U.S. Central Command carried out one of the most powerful airstrikes in Middle Eastern history, destroying all military targets on Iran's 'crown jewel' island, Kharg," Trump posted on Truth Social on March 13. "Our weapons are the most powerful and sophisticated in the world, but out of goodwill, I chose not to destroy the oil infrastructure on the island. However, if Iran or anyone else interferes with the free and safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz, I will immediately reconsider this decision." Escalation of Conflict and Oil Price ChaosMark Kimmitt, a former U.S. military official, commented that the attack on Kharg Island had significantly raised the stakes in the conflict, with the potential to send oil prices spiraling out of control. “This means we've escalated tensions in this conflict significantly. It's no longer just about attacking the military or the regime; now, we could be targeting the economic lifeblood of the country,” Kimmitt told CNN. He speculated that Washington might be using Kharg Island as a "bargaining chip" to force Iran to allow ships to pass freely through the strategic Strait of Hormuz—a key shipping lane through which about 20% of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas is transported. “If the oil infrastructure on the island is hit, Iran will undoubtedly target energy facilities across the Middle East," Kimmitt warned. "And at that point, oil prices will completely spiral out of control." Energy Economist Ed Hirs' PerspectiveEd Hirs, an energy economist and lecturer at the University of Houston, noted that the U.S. airstrike on Kharg could disrupt Iran’s oil exports. “Trump said he avoided targeting the island's oil infrastructure, but it's such a small island. Unless the military facilities are extremely small, I find it hard to believe that the oil export system was not affected,” Hirs told Al Jazeera. Hirs added that oil prices could continue to rise if Iran’s export capacity is hampered, especially since Iraq and Kuwait have not yet restored their oil activities, and if the conflict drags on for weeks or months. Such a scenario could severely harm the economies of Asian countries that rely heavily on crude oil and petroleum products. Kharg Island’s Oil Infrastructure Remains IntactDespite the intense airstrikes, Iranian state media reported that the country’s oil infrastructure on Kharg Island remained undamaged. The U.S. military focused its efforts on hitting Iran's defense positions, the Joshen naval base, an air traffic control tower, and a helicopter hangar, causing 15 explosions on the island. However, Iran has warned that it will not remain passive if its oil infrastructure is attacked. On March 14, the spokesperson for Iran’s Central Command, Khatam al-Anbiya, issued a statement seemingly in response to Trump’s comments about the U.S. airstrike on Kharg. According to the spokesperson, if Iran’s oil infrastructure is attacked, "all oil and energy infrastructure related to U.S. oil companies or those cooperating with the U.S. in the region will be destroyed and turned to ashes." Global Market ImpactThe broader energy market continues to brace for the potential fallout of these escalating tensions. The International Energy Agency (IEA) had already released 400 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves to counteract disruptions in the Middle East. The attack on Kharg Island underscores the growing conflict, with significant implications for global energy markets. As both the U.S. and Israel push forward with military actions, all eyes are now on Iran’s response and the broader consequences for the region and the world.